Metadata
- Source
- FLUID-1943
- Type
- Bug
- Priority
- Blocker
- Status
- Closed
- Resolution
- Fixed
- Assignee
- Michelle D'Souza
- Reporter
- Colin Clark
- Created
2008-12-08T12:47:50.000-0500 - Updated
2011-02-28T16:45:16.096-0500 - Versions
-
- 0.3
- 0.4beta1
- 0.4
- 0.5beta1
- 0.5
- 0.6beta1
- 0.6
- 0.7
- 0.8
- Fixed Versions
-
- 1.1
- Component
-
- Infrastructure
Description
At the moment, we copy license files into the js/ directory alongside our minified JavaScript. It would be much kinder to implementors to store these license files in a separate directory.
Comments
-
Anastasia Cheetham commented
2009-03-27T09:31:18.000-0400 Right now, the general idea with licensing is "Fluid's license unless otherwise stated" and the otherwise-stating is accomplished by including the other license file in with the other-licensed code.
If we move the licenses away from the code, how should we associated the license with the code? Were you imagining that we'd create a sub-folder called "license"?
-
Colin Clark commented
2009-03-30T10:27:06.000-0400 We shouldn't move the licenses away from code in the repository. This separate licenses folder should be created as a product of the build scripts. I think we can punt this issue until 1.1
-
Justin Obara commented
2009-05-12T13:39:20.000-0400 Changed the copySourceToBuild target. 1) Moved in the work of copying over the README.txt 2) exclude LICENSE files from being copied over with all other files 3) Copy licenses into a license directory
-
Justin Obara commented
2009-05-12T13:39:36.000-0400 Please review
-
Justin Obara commented
2009-05-13T12:40:41.000-0400 a slight bit of refactoring is needed
-
Justin Obara commented
2009-05-14T08:55:23.000-0400 Refactored the copying of the README.txt file, by removing it from a <fileset> and placing it within its own <copy>
-
Michelle D'Souza commented
2011-02-28T16:45:16.094-0500 Closing issues that were fixed in 1.1